![]() ![]() There is still a color shift in the deeper blue color, but the change in color for the marble top is less pronounced. The temperature is 2450K for both, but the Color Checker version has a +5 on the Green-Red tint versus the original +1 tint. ![]() ![]() Now, if we compare the picture above after the WB has been corrected by the eye dropper, we get the image below. There is a noticeable shift in some of the blues (Column 1/Row 3, Column 2/Row 2, Column 6/Row 3), as well as the marble countertop behind the Color Checker. As you can see from the before and after image below, the A99 is fairly accurate. If you have read my review on the X-Rite Color Checker Passport, then you may recall that you can use the Color Checker to not only check the accuracy of the white balance, but to also see how each camera interprets individual colors. ![]() The Green-Red tint stayed the same at +1. The temperature went from 2700K to 2450K. This is how the X-Rite Color Checker looks under the Tungsten WB preset.Īt first glance, it looks like that under this tungsten light, the A99’s Tungsten preset is a little warm, so I used Lightroom 4’s White Balance eyedropper on the neutral gray square under the yellow square on the bottom half of the Color Checker. According to Lightroom 4, the Tungsten White Balance (WB) preset on the Sony A99 is set at 2700K color temperature with a +1 on Green-Red tint. The lighting that I used for this test was nothing more than a tungsten bulb. I believe that on top of the images that I have in my review, this short test will reveal a quite a bit about the ISO performance of the Sony A99. The feedback from my Extensive Field Review on the Sony A99 has been tremendous, to say the least, and so I thought I follow it up with a short post on the studio test that I did with my make-shift still life set from my hotel room in Carmel. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |